THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS IN ASIA

نویسندگان

چکیده

Peer reviewers are the custodians of sciences and scientific publishing. Previously regarded as a purely altruistic work, with advent Publons Review Week initiatives, can now get scholarly credits for their accomplishments. The number skilled peer is limited. sheer volume published literature in today’s world calls active involvement large corpus reviewers. Asia has growing workforce biomedical researchers authors who inadequately exposed to global research reporting English writing standards. Several initiatives underway groom next generation credit them efforts. These need be expanded made more accessible scholars Asia. Ultimately, this untapped potential may provide quality services international peer-reviewed journals create informed authors.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

the impact of peer review on efl reviewers writing proficiency

امروزه تصحیح همکلاسی در کلاسهای نگارش یکی از اجزاء لاینفک کلاسهای دانش آموز محور است. تاثیرات مفید تصحیح همکلاسی بر زبان آموزان، معلمان را متقاعد کرده است که علیرغم صرف زمان، انرژی و توان بسیار، از این شیوه ی آموزشی در کلاسهای آموزش نگارش بهره بگیرند. تحقیق حاضر بر آن است تا با مقایسه دو گروه از یادگیرندگان زبان انگلیسی، تاثیر تصحیح همکلاسی را بر توانایی نوشتاری آنها نشان دهد. 122 خانم زبان آمو...

15 صفحه اول

The peer-review process.

Most authors experience that “sinking feeling” when reviewers’ comments and recommendations lead to rejection of a manuscript or the need for multiple revisions. It is important to bear in mind that this happens to most, if not all, scientists. Many times the reviewer or editor is correct, and with suitable revision, a better paper is ultimately published. Sometimes it is not. The author can th...

متن کامل

The peer-review process

The peer review process has been discussed at length in most of the established texts on the scholarly communication process, such as Ziman (1968), Ravetz (1973) and Meadows (1974). These authors agree that the four main functions of the scholarly literature are dissemination of current knowledge, archiving of the canonical knowledge base, quality control of published information, and assignmen...

متن کامل

Facilitating the Peer Review Process

Peer review, the process of improving the quality of work done by a peer of approximately equal caliber, is posited to be an effective educational tool and learning process. Unfortunately, many students participating in peer review lack confidence in the value of their feedback or experience difficulty maintaining interest in another student’s work, thus tending to create feedback that is super...

متن کامل

Preserving confidentiality in the peer review process.

FOR THE PAST YEAR OR SO, JAMA AND THE ARCHIVES OF Internal Medicine have been involved in litigation that significantly threatened the integrity of our peer review process. We now inform our reviewers, authors, and readers about the results of this litigation that preserve the confidentiality of our peer review process. Pfizer Inc is a defendant in more than 3000 lawsuits across the country all...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Central Asian journal of medical hypotheses and ethics

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2708-9800']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2020.1.2.06